Mao Tse-tung — The Unknown Story of How the Chairman led China to Communist Hell!

Exclusive for Hacienda Publishing, Inc.
Article Type: 
Published Date: 
Monday, April 14, 2014

Preliminary Note: The article that follows is a review of Mao — The Unknown Story乐动体育APP by Jung Chang and Jon Halliday. However, I have chosen to include this Preliminary Note before the formal review for reasons that will soon become apparent to the reader. This authoritative biography and history comes in a hefty tome illustrated with many rare photographs as well as detailed Maps of specific areas discussed in the text, which actually ends on page 631. The supportive material includes an additional 85 pages of meticulously compiled Notes followed by a comprehensive Bibliography of Chinese as well as Non-Chinese Sources. There is also an Index and a List of Interviewees and Archives Consulted.

Although I have considerable experience with Amazon.com reviews, I found the early reviews of this book, with negative comments and votes in the thousands, shocking. The book was appreciated by most readers; nevertheless, it ended unjustly with a rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars because of an unfair, orchestrated, political campaign of vilification of which Mao himself would have been proud. This reminds me, frankly, of the Active Measures and Disinformation Department of the Soviet KGB, although of course this orchestration would not be directed from Moscow, but from Beijing, and bolstered by the remaining bastions of Marxism in Western academia. The brief Epilogue in Mao — The Unknown Story (page 631) reads: "Today, Mao's portrait and his corpse still dominate Tiananmen Square in the heart of the Chinese capital. The current Communist regime declares itself to be Mao's heir and fiercely perpetuates the myth of Mao." The same can also be said for the followers of Mao in the West, who have fiercely attacked the courageous authors for revealing that the Chinese idol of communism was indeed rotten at the core! My sincere congratulations to the authors, Jung Chang and Jon Halliday, for this powerful exposé on Mao and The People's Republic of China.

Review: This superb, comprehensive and authoritative biography of Mao Tse-tung (1893-1976) as well as a history of China in the 20th century has a very appropriate subtitle — "The Unknown Story" — because much of the information here is not well known and is not found in other books on Mao or China. As such, the authors, Jung Chang and Jon Halliday,Mao — The Unknown Story乐动体育APP should be commended for their herculean task, vivid narration, and encyclopedic scholarship.

Among the many revelations, Mao — The Unknown Story depicts and documents Chairman Mao as the brutal monster he really was; how Mao desolated his own country and exterminated his own people, party cadres and impoverished peasants alike, even whole Red Army regiments. Mao committed in his blind rage whatever crimes were necessary to attain and preserve supreme political power. "Democracy," "justice," "equality," " fraternity," "freedom" were just words to be used for propaganda purposes, not ideals to be pursued by Chinese communists!

Joseph Stalin (1879-1953), another paranoid-megalomaniac and monster who committed untold atrocities — e.g., purges, executions, mass starvations, deaths by labor camps in the Gulag, rule by terror, etc. — shared some characteristics with Mao, yet there were differences. Stalin, at least, had personal appeal as a Soviet vozdh, who could inspire leadership — fear was mixed with awe and even admiration as Stalin ruled the Soviet Union with a dictatorial iron fist.

Stalin was noticed by Lenin, who recognized his usefulness, first as a bandit, who could obtain funds for the Party; later, as a hard-working administrator. A man who helped Lenin reach power and then ruled a communist Russia. Stalin worked hard for the Bolsheviks behind the scenes and gradually achieved supreme power because his abilities were underestimated. A comparison of Stalin and Mao is instructive in understanding the enigmatic personality of Mao in all his savagery. Here was a man who was lazy, insubordinate, and disliked by all who knew him. Yet, he seized power by duplicity, forced his subordinates to kowtow to him in abject Maosubmission; at times, he even defied Stalin and the Soviets who sustained him with money, arms, and assistance of all kind, and got away with it! Mao (photo, left) killed 70 million of his own people, turned the Red Bases in which he ruled into impoverished wastelands, but with subterfuge, propaganda, and American moles in the FDR administration eventually came to rule all of Mainland China for twenty-seven disastrous years. And during all those years in power Mao never took a bath, only having massages, and rarely brushed his teeth! And yet he was respected as a communist statesman and head of state of the most populous nation on earth.

Mao was hated and feared by all his followers, including the subservient Chou En-lai, ruling by absolute terror, without any principles of government, strategic foresight or judicious planning for the betterment of his country. Despite the mythic heroics of the Long March, the Chinese Civil War or the Sino-Japanese War, the fact is Mao never inspired his troops. Mao was lazy and used subterfuge and deceit to seize power from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and obtained the title of "Chairman," not from a plenum of the CCP, but from Joseph Stalin. Mao's power wasn't gained through merit or recognition from the Party at large, but by subterfuge, intimidation of, and threats to the individual members of his inner circle Politburo.

Mao ruled the Yenan Red Base for over a decade, before and during World War II. The province was devastated by mismanagement and plundering by the Red Army, turned into a wasteland under Mao's communist dictatorship. Independent thought and action were punished. All goods and implements of labor were seized from the peasants to force them into compliance. Opium was cultivated and sold with all profits going to Mao's communists while the people starved. Yenan's population was decimated, impoverishment became rampant, much worse than under the Nationalist rule of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek. Mao's Yenan Red Base was a government from hell, a prelude to what was to happen to the nation once the Chairman seized control of all of Mainland China.Chang Kuo-t'ao with Mao in Yenan

Mao sacrificed his family members for political ends. Wives, brothers, sons and daughters were left behind, deliberately abandoned to be shot by the Nationalists or die destitute in poor villages throughout China. Mao betrayed whole communist armies, when they happened to be led by military rivals. Red soldiers were led to their deaths by irresponsible decisions or deliberately to be decimated based only on Mao's maintenance of power and the elimination of competitors. The army of rival Chang Kuo-t'ao (pictured here with Mao in Yenan), the greatest and most successful army in the Long March (1934-35), was sent to the desolate northwest district to be deliberately betrayed and exterminated — thousands of soldiers buried alive, sacrificed by Mao for his own political ends. For Mao, supreme power was always paramount in all decisions.

This book also describes in graphic detail how China was delivered to Mao Tse-tung with active Soviet military assistance in Northern China, as well as the tacit consent of Britain and the U.S., misled by such moles as Owen Lattimore and Lauchlin Currie in the FDR administration.  Little is known about Stalin attacking and ordering the Soviet Army to occupy Outer Mongolia, seizing portions and important ports in Manchuria, and expropriating the strategic Eastern China Railway. The story of how Stalin helped Mao in the Civil War that ensued immediately after Japan's surrender on August 15, 1945 had not been told before. The Russo-Mongolian Soviet army, 1.5 million Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shekstrong, swept through and invaded all of Northern China across a 5,000 kilometer front, longer than the European front that stretched from the Baltic to the Adriatic Seas. Stalin ordered this army to continue to advance for several weeks after Japan's surrender, helping Mao take control and giving him territories and large caches of arms left by the Japanese. These bases and supplies would boost Mao in the ensuing Civil War against Chiang Kai-shek (photo, left). The occupied territories in northern China, inner Mongolia, and Manchuria were larger than those occupied by the Soviets in Eastern Europe.

Mao received the help he needed, even from the U.S., while Chiang Kai-shek was sidelined and betrayed. Little is known also (until this book) about several top generals in Chiang's Nationalist Army, whose treachery helped Mao gain power. These officers had been recruited by the CCP while receiving officers' training at the Whampoa Military Academy near Canton; they had become "sleeper agents"; and at the proper moment — ten, twenty years later, during the Civil War of 1946-1949, betrayed the Generalissimo, supplying vital military information, having whole armies massacred deliberately, or surrendering them to Mao.

Moles in the FDR administration continued to act on the behalf of Mao and Stalin, and against the United States, by slandering Chiang Kai-shek and exulting Mao. Mao was supposed to have Peng Dehuai乐动体育APPfought the Japanese, while Chiang was not doing any fighting. The opposite was the truth. Except for one military campaign fought in 1940 by the Red Army Commander Peng Dehuai (photo, right), who contravened Mao's order not to engage the Japanese, the Red Army had done little against the Japanese, as Mao wanted to keep his army intact for his ultimate confrontation with Chiang. One of Mao's orders to his army was "retreat when the enemy advances," which they did on almost all occasions. On the other hand, Chiang's Nationalist Army fought all the major engagements of World War II, while the Reds retreated and only occupied territories left behind by the advancing Japanese. Chang and Halliday write: "In Burma, they [the Nationalists] put more Japanese out of action in one campaign than the entire Communist army had in eight years in the whole of China." (p. 287)

Mao won the Civil War, not because he was beloved by the people or a better military strategist than Chiang, but simply because Mao was more ruthless and vicious than Chiang. And after the communist victory, how did Mao rule China as supreme leader? What were the historic events of communist China: the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution? You need to get and read this book. One word about the aftermath, what happened to Mao's closest comrades-in-arms — those whom he had tamed, humiliated, and terrorized for nearly half a century, some of them virtually from the founding of the CCP in 1927 to Mao's death in 1976? Here is a brief summary:

Chou En-lai with US President Richard Nixon in 1972乐动体育APPChou En-lai (1898-1976) was the servile assistant, the charming face Mao presented to the world for diplomatic and propaganda purposes. Chou (pictured in photo with U.S. President Richard Nixon in 1972) was probably the most gifted and conscientious follower; yet, he continued to serve Mao as a virtual slave, fawning over the Chairman, always submissive, and frequently made to recant his "past mistakes." He served as Foreign Minister of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 to 1958 and Premier from 1949 to 1976. Although he was ill, Chou tried to protect others and attempted to restrain the Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution. Yet he managed to survive the purges and violence. He was diagnosed with bladder cancer in 1974, but Mao refused to allow him to receive treatment, so that Chou would precede him in death. Chou continued to work even on his deathbed, trying unsuccessfully to moderate the Cultural Revolution, end the state of anarcho-tyranny, and keep the government of the PRC running. He died 8 months before Mao.

Lin Piao with Mao's Little Red BookLin Piao (1907-1971; photo, right) was the youngest of Mao's henchmen and participated in the Long March as a military commander. He was Mao's strongest supporter throughout the Civil War and later headed the People's Liberation Army (PLA). Lin was instrumental in the communist victory during the Civil War, particularly in the Northeastern and Manchurian campaigns. He ranked third among the Ten Marshalls, just below generals Zhu De and Peng Dehuai. He helped foster Mao's Cult of Personality and was rewarded by being designated successor during the Cultural Revolution, up to the time of his mysterious disappearance in 1971. Only later did the world learn that Lin was implicated in an unsuccessful plot to oust Chairman Mao. Reportedly, Lin had been denounced by his daughter while attempting to escape to the USSR. Lin, his wife, and son were killed in a plane crash in Mongolia. Officially, Lin Piao, Jian Qing, and the "Gang of Four" are blamed by the PRC for the excesses of the Cultural Revolution.

Liu Shao-ch'i乐动体育APPLiu Shao-ch'i (1898-1969; photo, left) participated in the Long March and supported Mao's leadership at the Zunyi conference in 1935. He helped Mao rule as second in command, assisted Mao in consolidating power and governing in Yenan, and was appointed political commissar for the reconstituted New 4th Army. After Mao's victory over Chiang Kai-shek and the establishment of Red China (PRC), Liu remained loyal to Mao and in 1959 was designated successor to Mao as "Closest Comrade in Arms." But witnessing the suffering of the Chinese people in the provinces, Liu tried to moderate the viciousness of the Great Leap Forward (1958-1959), for which he paid a heavy price. He was superseded by Lin Piao, and during the Cultural Revolution, Liu and his family became targets and were savagely persecuted. He was accused of "taking the capitalist road" and becoming "China's Khrushchev." He was imprisoned, tortured, and died an agonizing death in prison in 1969.

Jiang Qing

Jiang Qing (1914-1991; photo, right), "Madame Mao," was Mao's fourth wife and constant companion. She had been an actress in Shanghai and joined the underground CCP in 1932. She began living with Mao and then married him in 1938. During the Cultural Revolution, she emerged as a leader and was the head of the notorious "Gang of Four," which was deposed by Deng Xiaoping. She was arrested in October 1976, one month after Mao's death. She was prosecuted and at her trial (photo, left), she retorted in her defense, "I was Chairman Mao's dog. Whoever Chairman Mao asked me to bite. I bit." She was sentenced to death but her sentence was commuted to life in prison. She was released in 1984 for medical reasons and committed suicide in 1991.

Chang Kuo-t'ao Chang Kuo-t'ao (1897-1979) was a founding member of the CCP and studied in the Soviet Union. He was the commander of the largest and most successful communist army during the Long March (1936-1937), acting independent of Mao. He was Mao's fiercest rival and contested him for the leadership of both the Red Army and the CCP. Before joining Mao in Yenan, his army was sabotaged and destroyed by Mao's treachery. In 1938, Chang renounced communism and escaped from Yenan to join the Nationalists. After the defeat of Chiang Kai-shek in the Civil War (1946-1949), Chang was fortunate to escape to Taiwan, and years later moved to Canada (pictured left, in Toronto in 1974). Chang wrote vivid memoirs in exile that provided valuable information, became a Christian, and died in 1979 in Toronto at age 82. The other military commanders, as we have seen and will see further, were not as fortunate as Chang.

Zhu De

Zhu De (1886-1976), unlike most of the other Chinese leaders, came from a poor peasant background. Nevertheless, he obtained an education and traveled abroad. He was a leader of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), participating in the Nanchang Uprising of 1927 that formed the Red Army. Zhu (photo, right) and Mao led the Zhu-Mao Army in the south. He supported Mao at the Zunyi conference in 1935, and with the advent of the Long March (1936-1937), Zhu was one of the military commanders. Later, he headed the 8th Route Army with Peng Dehuai during the Sino-Japanese War. During the Civil War of 1946-1949, Zhu commanded the PLA. After the victory over Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalists, and the formation of the PRC, he was awarded "Marshall of the People's Republic of China." He became Vice-Chairman of the PRC (1954-1959) and the CCP (1956-1966). But, Mao did not let bygones be bygones, and Zhu was later humiliated and disgraced during the Cultural Revolution because of "past mistakes," but he was reinstated in the CCP in 1973. He died two months before Mao.

Peng Dehuai during Cultural Revolution乐动体育APPPeng Dehuai (1898-1974), along with Chang Kuo-t'ao and Lin Piao, was one the best and most successful Red Army military commanders. Peng was already a soldier at the age of 16, and fought for various warlords in Hunan province. He joined and fought with the Kuomitang (Nationalist) Army in 1926 and participated in Chiang Kai-shek's Northern Expedition. By this time he had become a communist, and he soon broke with Chiang to join the CCP. Allied with the Zhu-Mao Army, he fought against the Nationalists to preserve the Red bases. He also supported Mao at the Zunyi Conference and was a Red Army commander during the Long March (1936-1937). Peng was an advocate of a ceasefire with Chiang Kai-shek in order to fight the common enemy, the invading Japanese, and successfully re-energyzed the communist army during the ensuing Sino-Japanese War. Peng commanded the "Hundred Regiments," a victorious campaign and the only major battle the communists ever fought against Japan (August-December, 1940). He was to pay later for that victorious campaign, an engagement that had not been authorized by Mao. Peng was the commander of the Chinese forces fighting in the Korean War (1950-1953) and Defense Minister of the PRC from 1954 to 1959. But Mao's long memory did not forget, and Peng became a target and victim of the Cultural Revolution (photo, above). The former hero was dragged in the street and beaten to death by Maoist Red Guards in 1974.

In short, Mao's legacy is one of unadulterated brutality and repressive dictatorship with no respect for life, liberty or justice. It is no coincidence that Mao's greatest disciples were notable psychopaths: Pol Pot (1925-1998 ) who killed one million of his own people in Cambodia, and Abimael "Gonzalo" Guzman (1934- ) who exterminated thousands of the indigenous peasants of Peru leading the Maoist terrorist organization, Sendero Luminoso乐动体育APP, the "Shining Path" guerillas.

Despite the book's size at 814 pages, the text is enthralling and reads in novelistic fashion with fast-paced, flowing narrative. Truly this is a magnificent book worth reading. I agree with Simon Sebag Montefiore, author of and Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar, who praised this tome in The Sunday Times of London, as " AHitler, Stalin, Mao triumph that exposes its subject as probably the most disgusting of the bloody troika of 20th-century tyrant-messiahs, in terms of character, deeds — and number of victims. This is the first intimate, political biography of the greatest monster of them all — the Red Emperor of China." I highly recommend this tome for those interested in the history of revolutions and totalitarianism in the 20th century, in general, and communist China and Chairman Mao, in particular. Get this book and read it! 

Written by Dr. Miguel Faria

Miguel A. Faria Jr., M.D. is Associate Editor in Chief and World Affairs Editor of Surgical Neurology International. He is Clinical Professor of Surgery (Neurosurgery, ret.) and Adjunct Professor of Medical History (ret.), Mercer University School of Medicine. Dr. Faria is the author of Cuba in Revolution — Escape From a Lost Paradise (2002). Dr Faria has written numerous articles on Stalin, communism, and the Soviet Union, all posted at the author’s website: & www.drmiguelfaria.com

Copyright ©2014 Miguel A. Faria, Jr., M.D.

Mao — The Unknown Story by Jung Chang and Jon Halliday. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY, 2005, 814 pages.

The photographs used to illustrate this commentary came from a variety of sources and do not necessarily appear in Chang and Halliday's Mao — The Unknown Story.

Your rating: None Average: 5 (10 votes)
Comments on this post

Speaking truth to power

Excellent review of an excellent book.

Some believe Americans can't handle the truth.

乐动体育APPBut others like George Santayana believe that if we don't learn from the past, we're doomed to repeat it.

In the interest of truth...

I always find it a little bit amazing when people attack Mao full force like this -- not that there aren't a lot of harsh criticisms that can be made, but there are also important facts that should matter. I think maybe Americans have been so propagandized against Mao's Communism that they're either completely uneducated, or are simply refusing to acknowledge that before Mao the majority of people in China were horrifically treated under feudalism, that that most people there died extremely young, and that most had absolutely no education whatsoever. While Mao can be criticized for getting a great many things wrong, it also happens to be a fact that his policies vastly improved the welfare of a huge majority of the Chinese people.
It's not even up for debate that Mao greatly reduced the level of poverty and hunger and provided free health care and education -- which gave the majority of people there the first educational opportunities they had ever had any access to.
乐动体育APP That Mao Zedong's policies had to have been good for most (not all) Chinese people is reflected in the fact that the average life expectancy in China increased from 35 years in 1949 (when Mao took over), to 65 years by the 1970s (when his rule ended) -- and that happens to have been a higher life expectancy than existed in Africa, the Middle East, South Asia and in many Latin American countries during that same time frame. I get that Mao can be attacked, but truly glaring facts such as these should also matter too -- if we actually wish to take an objective view of what his policies did on a wider scale.

Mao's apologists!

Dr. Faria: The article,"The Long March of 1935" by Richard Cavendish (History Today; Volume 60; Issue 10; 2010), regretfully contains disputable information that he establishes as fact. As it regards this book, Cavendish writes:

"The book received rave reviews at first, but considered judgments by academic experts on China were more critical. That the story of the Long March had been tweaked and burnished to reflect the maximum credit on Chinese Communism in general and Mao in particular was generally accepted, but beyond that the revisionist account given by Jung Chang and Halliday was widely rejected as more fantasy than fact."

乐动体育APPSuch comments seems typical of left-wing bias permeating the ivory towers of academia where Marxist works are still highly praised — and that I intimated about in my own review. True, there were mixed reviews but the book was certainly not rejected "as more fantasy than fact."

In fact it was praised by such scholars of the Cold war and communism as Simon Sebag Montefiore, author of Young Stalin and Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar (The Sunday Times [London]; May 29, 2005). It was also praised by Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times乐动体育APP, Professor Richard Baum of the University of California, and Professor Perry Link at Princeton University, among others, including myself.

It would be nice to also have a favorable review of this monumental book that the scholar Gwynne Dyer stated "would eventually have a similar impact in China as Alexander Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago乐动体育APP did in the Soviet Union." Something I wish it would do to free the Chinese people and bring them liberty along with prosperity.

Professor R.J. Rummel (author of the monumental, Death by Government乐动体育APP), whom I have met, even feels he must re-estimate his numbers of Mao's democide because of Chang and Halliday's book!

Must amusing is the fact that Cavendish writes: "The leaders, including Mao, did very little marching, incidentally; they were carried along in litters." Given
the tone of his article, one gets the impression he is skeptical of his own sentence, but the fact remains that the top cadres, including Chairman Mao, was carried in a litter for most of the Long March, as admitted to by Mao's greatest apologists, Edgar Snow and Harrison Salisbury in their celebrated books. Jung Chang's book is superb and well-documented, despite the politically prejudiced detractors who bank on Fidel, Raul, Che, and Mao to carry on the legacy, now that Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, and Co, have fallen of their pedestals!

Sam: As I've mentioned before, I've read this book and found the scholarship exemplary. The Cavendish review was deficient. We are in agreement.

乐动体育APPA large contingent of Mao apologists is still around, almost as big as the Stalinist Russia apologists. There are ignorant fools who frequently quote Mao and cite his virtues as if he was some philosopher saint - when he's a mere monster, having killed more people than Hitler and Stalin combined.

The Author replies!

乐动体育APPI have received the following note that may be of interest to the readers:

Dear Dr Miguel Faria,

乐动体育APPThank you so much for your most appreciative and perceptive review. Jon and I feel much rewarded. We are also grateful that you mentioned the 'orchestrated political campaign of vilification' and pointed out that it was 'bolstered by the remaining bastions of Marxism in Western academia'. Very true, and very sad.

乐动体育APPI am looking forward to reading Cuba in Revolution -- Escape From a Lost Paradise (which I will ask my assistant to order after Easter) and 'Stalin's Mysterious Death', which I have just downloaded. Hope our paths will cross one day. Meanwhile, Happy Easter!

Jung Chang, Co-Author of Mao — The Unknown Story乐动体育APP with Jon Halliday